@intelwire Can you explain what you'd look for to answer the "how much content" question? As opposed to #s in report?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel How many leads and investigations generated by Awlaki trip-wires. Blacked out in Webster but looks to be triple-digits.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @intelwire
@intelwire OK, leads as opposed to intercepts. That clarification might be helpful in your post.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel The number of intercepts matters too. If there were 600 emails a month or 60 makes a difference.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @intelwire
@intelwire That's the number they DO give us: 7143 over the course of the time Hasan emails came in, average of 65-70/day.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Also not clear the 7,143 was just Awlaki.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @intelwire
@intelwire It is across the multiple mentions of numbers. See, eg, 46, they say Jan-Feb was 3000 "in the Aulaqi investigation."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Thanks, I updated the post to reflect.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @intelwire
@intelwire I agree w/your post, btw, just was thinking distinction bet leads generated and actual intercepts collected worthwhile.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You raised a good point, something I just missed in the chaos of the last couple weeks.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@intelwire No biggie. Like you I've been putting off a couple of posts on the report, partly on Awlaki/Hasan, partly on what ELSE it says.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.