@AdamSerwer Given DiFi specially said this had to go through SSCI bc program is covert, and there's a covert out, prolly worth noting?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel "This section adds two large exceptions to the disclosure requirements, by exempting the White House from having to disclose...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamSerwer
@AdamSerwer So you're asking people to link through to get the accurate reading, leaving inaccurate reading in your post.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel there's nothing incorrect in the post1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamSerwer
@AdamSerwer I see. it's just that 1) we know this is authorized by finding 2) law limited to findings, 3) post doesn't mention that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel we don't know what legal analysis exists, because it's secret. There could be other memos not related to specific finding3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamSerwer
@AdamSerwer We also know DOJ and CIA have withheld Drafts, and we k now DOJ always withholds "drafts" under execpriv.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel but we just don't know what they have, or if there are legal memos on tk not related to specific ops1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamSerwer
@AdamSerwer They have admitted there is a memo. They have also hidden other analysis as draft analysis.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@AdamSerwer Did you read the response to ACLU? It said there was a memo. It also said they were discussing draft legal analysis in 5.11.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.