@DanaHoule I'll give you Senate obstruction (though note judicial slow appoints is half OBama's fault for not appointing people).
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Wait, are you saying the GOP would have blocked fewer appointments than they have had Obama made more nominations?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule If he had actually done what every other POTUS has and actually nominated people, Senate Rs would own all the blame. They don't.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Because Obama didn't nominate someone for open spot B, the GOP isn't to blame for blocking appointee for open spot A?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule That's totally misrepresenting what I said. In that case, Obama is responsible for B, and GOP for A. BOTH responsible.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel ...because if Obama had nominated more people the numbers of those confirmed would be greater? I'm doubtful.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule So yeah, 3 years out you can say that. But that doesn't explain 3 years of failure to do basic first step.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I disagree, but let's stipulate you're right about nominations. Irrelevant to your false equivalency on obstruction2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule But we now have Dems obstructing on LEGAL issues where there SHOULDN'T be legal questions. Now there have to be.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm not informed enough to have an opinion on that particular issue. I'm simply rejecting the false equivalency that Dems=GOP1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DanaHoule Which I ceded to you on the Senate point--but not the legal coverup issue--before we both ate dinner.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.