I'm so old I remember when Republicans complained they were not speaking to the human beings who were firsthand witnesses.https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1222176642988236806 …
-
-
Lindsey must know the White House hopes to suppress Bolton's book (goddamnit it all to hell if Bolton is going to be this scandal's Daniel Ellsberg) to prevent voters from learning what the Senate could have known before they acquitted Trump.
Prikaži ovu nit -
BREAKING: Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham demands the Senate review hearsay evidence in private rather than hearing from the first-hand fact witness publicly.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Hoping the reporters covering impeachment today ask each and every one of Trump's House defenders whether they support Lindsey's preference for hearsay evidence over a direct fact witness willing to testify?
Prikaži ovu nit -
Also, if reporters are asking Trump's House flunkies about Lindsey's preference for hearsay over direct fact witnesses, they also might ask about Lindsey's preference for accessing evidence in secret bunkers rather than in public.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
More than anything they don't want footage of damning claims being made before them. They're happy to consult with him in a secure facility, especially if it's his book instead of him, but they'd prefer their ignoring of the evidence be done in secret and as quietly as possible.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
It also misses the point entirely. Bolton and every other relevant witnesses should testify and be challenged on cross-examination so that we can determine their credibility for ourselves. Just reading a manuscript is meaningless, as it's not under oath and carefully crafted.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
If they agree to this, I believe most of them will say they read it and it was a “nothingburger” while not having gone and read it at all
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I'm shocked that
@lindseygrahamSC is suggesting he's more comfortable doing something behind closed doors with a bunch of men, rather than in public....Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
They're "spin artists"they have to have that info AND group together before anyone else to spin it and redraft it together- They will demand sole entitlement through a subpoena for Bolton, Bolton will give written answers to Republicans and restrict Schiff etc. to major redaction
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
BINGO! But the book will be out in March??? (Rumor has it Trump is going to try to block it.) A March release could bite the GOP in the butt come November (more so than their tactics already have).
-
It may come out sooner. The security review deadline is 1/30/2020, if WH fails to meet that, then it could be out in ebook format on 1/31/2020 or 2/1/2020, with print copies as early as 2/15. Because you can't beat this sort of publicity, especially when it's free.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
