Also was stopped from asking Kavanaugh questions when she established that the July 1 get-together might be the date in question.https://twitter.com/adamslily/status/1046719466116194304 …
-
-
her memo skipped him entirely. She was there in the room. She could have formed a conclusion. As to his job fitness.
-
It was unprofessional and unethical for her not to do so. In any other setting, her failure to inform a corporate or institutional client of Kavanaugh's clear lack of credibility and the ease with which his credibility could be impeached would amount to malpractice.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So Rachel Mitchell is a zealot hack. I am shocked I tell you! SHOCKED!
-
Why didn’t you warn us?
-
Right?? I am just one little cactus out here in the desert.....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In any other setting, her failure to inform an institutional or corporate client of Kavanaugh's lack of credibility and the ease with which his credibility would be impeached at trial would amount to malpractice. Allowing Kavanaugh to testify again would be suborning perjury.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mitchell is clearly unfit for her current role in AZ. Who is taking steps to have her removed? If she remains, that will probably have a chilling effect on reporting in her jurisdiction.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's because after she pointed out the July 1st connection, they would no longer let her talk. Hmmmm.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's all true, although I keep having to remind people that it's not really her fault-- the Republicans didn't give her a chance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.