Here's a point a reader made: 1) The 65-woman letter came b4 Dr. Ford's name became public (and some people withdrew after her name did become public). 2) So Ford should, at least conceivably, have been invited to join the letter. 1/n
-
-
If he can say Judge and Brett were at a party and drunk with Ford also present that goes a long long way. Remember that Judge and Brett deny even having been at a party with Ford that summer...
-
He can also say Brett was lying about drinking and sexual habits. And hell maybe there’s even more he knows, given his proximity.
-
It’s absolutely devastating for Brett to have been observed in a “blackout” drunk state at the party because it means his recollection can’t be trusted. That’s the real value of a Chris Garrett and probably Mark Judge too.
-
Yes Judge since he can speak to the assault. But as has been discussed many times over, nothing out of the ordinary happened for the other attendees, so it’s likely they don’t remember anything about that party.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Squi can corroborate the events, the location, the layout of the house, the inebriation of K&J
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They 2 some degree may/may not, have observed laughing duo, her body, face & pace while exiting house, some maybe 8 miles from her home.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And... this explanation would also demolish the “I believe Ford but maybe Kavanaugh was blacked out for the whole thing and has no recollection, so he’s not really lying either” theory.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.