Here's a point a reader made: 1) The 65-woman letter came b4 Dr. Ford's name became public (and some people withdrew after her name did become public). 2) So Ford should, at least conceivably, have been invited to join the letter. 1/n
-
-
Add this to the reasons why the Ed Whelan hoax was so ham-handed. 1) It seems they were trying to take out the witness to the event who might be sympathetic to Ford 2) Now Squi, a middle school teacher, is pissed he was falsely accused 3) Suggests Whelan/Kav knew Squi's role
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I really don't know that the FBI is going to dig deep enough. It's so frustrating that people on twitter are connecting dots and the Senate isn't. It comes down to the media i think.
-
The testimony so far, along with SM research published, have provided a strong foundation for the FBI to build facts. The facts will eventually erode GOP confidence and support. Just need 2.
-
Idk that the FBI will 'conclusively' be able to prove anything So it is mostly public perception and fear of backlash. So we have to call.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And came right to July 1 before trained prosecutor
@LindseyGrahamSC knew to blow it all up. Looks like their female assistant may end up being a friend to all womenThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.