Here's a point a reader made: 1) The 65-woman letter came b4 Dr. Ford's name became public (and some people withdrew after her name did become public). 2) So Ford should, at least conceivably, have been invited to join the letter. 1/n
-
-
So if Ford was NOT asked to be on that 65-lady letter (a smaller number still back it), then it suggests EITHER someone knew not to invite her to be OR the 65 ladies aren't representative of the women who were in Kavanaugh's circles that summer.
Show this thread -
Oops. Forgot the link to
@pbump.https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/27/republicans-prosecutor-may-have-helped-undercut-kavanaughs-defense/ …Show this thread -
Add this to the reasons why the Ed Whelan hoax was so ham-handed. 1) It seems they were trying to take out the witness to the event who might be sympathetic to Ford 2) Now Squi, a middle school teacher, is pissed he was falsely accused 3) Suggests Whelan/Kav knew Squi's role
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
An innocent man who never did the horrible things Dr. Ford detailed would immediately scream for a thorough FBI investigation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ohhhh that’s why they thought to pin it on him
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.