This is confusing. Some anti-Kavanaugh types think they've found something significant in diary for July 1, 1982. Entry: 'Tobin's house -- Workout/Go to Timmy's for Skis w/Judge, Tom, PJ, Bernie, Squi.' 1/5
-
-
There are people who are Pro/Anti kavanaugh.. and then there are people who look for evidence. If you look at the evidence, you can only conclude that he is innocent.
-
Why? He's a serial liar, according to the evidence, and his testimony repeatedly corroborated Ford's claims.
-
What evidence? All the witnesses reject her story and back up his. Are we looking at the same thing?
-
Which witnesses, did I miss a proper investigation prior to vote?
-
You must have missed it. All witnesses swore that they have no memory of the party and/or had no memory of every meeting kavanaugh.
-
1) Their lawyers swore. They did not. 2) Judge having no memory is consistent with Ford's account.
-
The witness signed a statement under penalty of felonious perjury
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Not evidence, fantasy and desperation. By the way, evidence and proof is supposed to be on the the accuser...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ford left the party very early
-
Dr. Ford left the gathering after she was assulted. If that was “early” that only means they assulted her early.
-
She made clear she thought this was a preparty. She had an early curfew. The other people might have shown up later.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why would you apply good intent to a gaggle of politicians who openly stated their opposition to Kavanaugh the moment his nomination was announced?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since the only evidence exonerates Kav, they would be pro Kav
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.