Total of 5, now!
-
-
-
Who are the last two?
-
Anonymous letters; they don’t want to go public...but one involves Kavanaugh when he was drunk and in his 30s. Each also have witnesses.
-
I think it smart to focus on the ones with names attached.
-
I understand, but I think it’s wrong to discount them entirely just b/c they are anonymous. Just b/c they didn’t take a sworn deposition or come forward publicly doesn’t mean what they saw didn’t happen.
-
I agree. My point was that Senators on the Judiciary Committee have known about these letters and questioning Kavanaugh already without releasing any information to the public. They just want to slam this through.
@jack Edit button, please! -
I also believe that this is yet more reason for a full investigation by the FBI.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I wonder if you could include Judge's ex whose name I forgot in the New Yorker piece.
-
Rasor?
-
That's not Kavanaugh necessarily.
-
The answers to a lot of these questions are hiding out in Delaware. The guy with direct knowledge, even with a hazy memory.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Senate GOP up to something throwing 2 unnamed accusers out there today. Either sowing confusion with anonymous accusations or piling on to try to get him to quit.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ladies, PLEASE teach your daughters: If you grab one or both testicles and squeeze as hard as you can while jerking HARD, he'll stop. Every time. If it comes off you get to keep it.
-
And when he denies it was him the way he walks is a dead giveaway.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
FYI Swetnik’s x alleges she is not credible. He filed a restraining order against her. She herself has filed several suits.
-
FYI her ex basically committed ID fraud of her. Politico has the whole story.
-
Do@you have the link to read the article?
-
One has nothing to do with the other. He had to get a restraining order.
-
Yeah, they're related. Did you read the article? Sure seem to have missed a bunch of stuff.
-
Yes, I read it. I am being cautious as there is so much info flying around. It is very unfortunate WH or Judiciary Comm leaders didn’t ask for new FBI invedtigation
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.