The guy who helped impeach Bill Clinton for a (consensual) blowjob just claimed he couldn't have sexually assaulted anyone because he didn't have vaginal intercourse. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/09/25/brett-kavanaugh-it-depends-on-what-the-meaning-of-the-phrase-sexual-assault-is/ …
-
-
No its not. Because read it again, he says anything close to sexual intercourse. Aka hes not skirting via blowjob.pic.twitter.com/af7zy52B4E
-
Again, you're making my point by emphasizing that he keeps talking about vaginal intercourse. Go ahead, provide more proof he's using the Bill Clinton defense. I'll just sit and drink ice tea.
-
He never uses the phrase vaginal intercourse. Thats your concoction. Youre wildly speculating over some imagined thing.
-
So you don't think the presence of a lie already in that sentence (the drinking age was increased to 21 when he was 17) means that the rest of what he says is a lie too?
-
False. It was beer-specific 18. He stated beer in the interview.
-
beer specific? In MD in 1982 it was raised to 21 for everything.
-
No, it didnt raise until July 1st. And it was exempt for people who were already 18 on July 1st. Do you have a date for the party? No you dont because even the accuser has no idea when it happened.pic.twitter.com/DJy77EPxbv
-
And he was still 17 on July 1st 1982.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.