The guy who helped impeach Bill Clinton for a (consensual) blowjob just claimed he couldn't have sexually assaulted anyone because he didn't have vaginal intercourse. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/09/25/brett-kavanaugh-it-depends-on-what-the-meaning-of-the-phrase-sexual-assault-is/ …
-
-
If you never had any kind of sexual activity to begin with of course you couldn't have sexually assaulted someone. Unless he used someone elses body and dick or some kind of foreign object like a broom. We're not even talking about that.
-
There! You've made your case. Virgin ≠ never had any kind of sexual activity. Which is why it's crystal clear Kavanaugh is doing what Clinton did.
-
No its not. Because read it again, he says anything close to sexual intercourse. Aka hes not skirting via blowjob.pic.twitter.com/af7zy52B4E
-
Again, you're making my point by emphasizing that he keeps talking about vaginal intercourse. Go ahead, provide more proof he's using the Bill Clinton defense. I'll just sit and drink ice tea.
-
He never uses the phrase vaginal intercourse. Thats your concoction. Youre wildly speculating over some imagined thing.
-
So you don't think the presence of a lie already in that sentence (the drinking age was increased to 21 when he was 17) means that the rest of what he says is a lie too?
-
False. It was beer-specific 18. He stated beer in the interview.
-
beer specific? In MD in 1982 it was raised to 21 for everything.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
None idiot...Kavanaugh didn’t “relate” them...YOU DID
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.