The guy who helped impeach Bill Clinton for a (consensual) blowjob just claimed he couldn't have sexually assaulted anyone because he didn't have vaginal intercourse. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/09/25/brett-kavanaugh-it-depends-on-what-the-meaning-of-the-phrase-sexual-assault-is/ …
-
-
That word is in the transcript and he affirms it. Vaginal intercourse isnt.pic.twitter.com/Cb5NzTZsZE
-
Okay, I'll hold your hand here. What relation is there between virginity and sexual assault?
-
If you never had any kind of sexual activity to begin with of course you couldn't have sexually assaulted someone. Unless he used someone elses body and dick or some kind of foreign object like a broom. We're not even talking about that.
-
There! You've made your case. Virgin ≠ never had any kind of sexual activity. Which is why it's crystal clear Kavanaugh is doing what Clinton did.
-
No its not. Because read it again, he says anything close to sexual intercourse. Aka hes not skirting via blowjob.pic.twitter.com/af7zy52B4E
-
Again, you're making my point by emphasizing that he keeps talking about vaginal intercourse. Go ahead, provide more proof he's using the Bill Clinton defense. I'll just sit and drink ice tea.
-
He never uses the phrase vaginal intercourse. Thats your concoction. Youre wildly speculating over some imagined thing.
-
So you don't think the presence of a lie already in that sentence (the drinking age was increased to 21 when he was 17) means that the rest of what he says is a lie too?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.