I am not so certain about the "Rosenstein was being sarcastic" line as others seem to be. May 16, 2017 was a wild time. Days after Trump had given Russians classified intel in the Oval Office, his comments to Lester Holt re: Comey firing.
-
-
Replying to @awprokop
Right! But then why tell the story w/o mentioning either of those details? THAT's one of NYT's biggest failures, IMO. They gave none of the most important context for those convos, and apparently couldn't get the different meetings straight.
3 replies 3 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Yeah, the framing was definitely odd. As if everything else was normal and only Rosenstein was behaving "erratically."
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likes
That's one complaint I have about it. Schmidt has always famously struggled to even envision the conspiracy side. Adam hasn't been writing much on this generally. As a result, big holes in the middle of their story precisely where the story should be.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.