To the critics of The New York Times Rosenstein story...pic.twitter.com/nofme6tlt4
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Two other outlets advanced the story with direct in the room sources just hours after the times article shows me the times editors 2/
And it happened in May 2017 why rush to press without seeking quotes from people IN THE ROOM as NBC and WaPo were able to do within minutes of story being published? Stop enabling this administration and falling for their latest "storyline"
The NYT is horrible.
On the Russia story I mean.
.@nytmike has a habit of being set up like that.
https://cnn.it/2QR4icA
Remember when he reported Clinton was under criminal when she wasn't?
They had to issue TWO corrections.
It's what spawned the "Lock her up" movement.
Yet he insisted the mistake was no big deal.
The story was, at the very least, half-baked. The NYT knows better. So why did they make this choice? Sheer competition? Stupidity? Or what?
Should have evaluated this a bit further before releasing, ESPECIALLY knowing it would def. be used as a cudgel to fire Rosenstein. 3/
I’m no journalist but this looks Busch league to me. Reporters always need to consider the impact of their reporting. The fact that 1/
Mike Schmidt also was first to break the Hillary Clinton private email server story. He does fantastic and effective oppo research for Trump
Salient point, also this statement clearly fails to address the nbc reporting which claims to have a source in the actual room
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.