But that still leaves open a question: he claims his court testimony is true. Would an immunity deal immunize him for obstruction based on contradicting his proffer?
-
-
I've read it, and I believe you are mistaken about what Manafort was facing in DC. The plea deal actually cut his exposure almost in half, even if he gets no credit at all for cooperation. But I think we are spinning our wheels at this point - have a good evening.
-
Fair enough. I'm not arguing Manafort was wrong to take the plea, just that no argument about why he did that looks only at those sentencing guidelines provides a full explanation for his choices.
-
I will go with
@RDEliason fact-based analysis vs.@emptywheel speculation designed to fit her long-running (but, in many instances, unsubstantiated) theories. Let's stick to the facts. Or else we have gone down Trump's rabbit hole. -
Your argument is that Manafort didn't go 10 months before he started considering a plea? Because the facts I'm focused on are known, past events, not (well educated) speculation about how a trial will likely come out.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.