Her logic based, prosecutorial approach is turning Kavanaugh into a boring denial robot that sounds like he's stuck on a loop.
-
-
-
"I do not recall studying law nor can I comment on any case history at this time without fear of purhuring myself"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is it normal protocol to not comment on this 1889 case?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Total coincidence that the White House “resistance” op ed dropped during the hearings. I’m sure the author had no desire to direct media attention away from the hearings.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is that even plausible? That he's never studied this landmark case?
-
Didn't Bork refuse to comment on Marbury v. Madison?
-
Scalia too (I had to google). And Souter and many others. But it's Kav's reason that's unconvincing. Like Clarence Thomas: said he'd never thought abt Roe.https://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/12/politics/politicsspecial1/nocomment-is-common-at-hearings-for-nominees.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
She is nailing him to his own petard. And Kavanaugh is supplying the nails.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yik Wo?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.