Harris, now getting more specific: Were you ever part of a conversation. Harris: The specific person is you. Kavanaugh is dodging again. The answer is no.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Harris: Could a reasonable person question your independence in cases pertaining to POTUS civil or criminal.
Show this thread -
Harris: Kagan committed to recusing on SG cases, Breyer, committed on his financial firm, etc etc. Will you commit to recusing in any case involving ...
Show this thread -
Harris: Is it your opinion that those other nominees violated independence by recusing?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can bet now that he gave a definitive no answer....she is not done. She has something up her sleeve. She just had to hear him say no. I could be wrong but we'll see.
-
He’ll still get confirmed. After his responses, I don’t know why Collins and Murkowski can vote for him, but they will
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
she has receipts!!
-
No evidence of that.
-
yeah. she kinda lost that one. not good
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Also cannot opine upon a case from 1898... https://history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/chinese-immigration …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This stinks like an overripe Limburger cheese.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.