If you're definition of "shorter" is: twisting the facts to support a narrative, then I agree with you. Fortunately, though the Longer Kavanaugh: Nixon's case was one of the four greatest in US history, but asking for an opinion on a hypothetical isn't legally answerable. get it?
-
-
-
It was a yes or no question. If he's unwilling to answer that one, even with caveats, it's a major red flag.
-
I do agree with you he could have qualified his answer to make it clear that if the legal facts support it, it's possible. But I think he did that by supporting the Nixon case and saying it was one of the 4 greatest.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Except that's not what he said. He said he would talk about US v. Nixon, but would not engage in a hypothetical concerning an issue he may have to hear, if confirmed.
-
So what will he say about US v Nixon?
-
He said it was, in his opinion, one of the four most important decisions the Court had ever made. Together with Brown and two others I missed.
-
Marbury and Youngstown.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is why we need to see the complete records, not just the cherry picked ones. As Feinstein just said, K has learned the art of filibuster. And he is quite good at talking around current relevant issues.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Smh this guy is a joke
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because 9/11
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#StopKavanaugh#NoKavanaugh#NoKavanaughVote#NoKavanaughConfirmation#WhatsAtStake#ReleaseTheRecords#ReleaseTheDocuments#WhatAreTheyHiding#BlockBrett#BlockKavanaugh#BlockBrettKavanaugh#GOPCorruption#GOPcoverup#GOPComplicit#GOPSuperPACsRussia#TrumpISNotAboveTheLawpic.twitter.com/eLP34f7Sa5
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
wait. . . what?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Threats are always so much more pressing when they happened decades ago.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No no no. Nixon could not be subpoenaed. Clinton could be subpoena. Cause he was a democrat
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yup, bc he said it was based on the statute, current investigation done under different rules
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And a Dem president? Think he will change his tune then?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and Clinton had to be, but not Bush.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
