cc: @emptywheel The M&Ms are at it again with their obsessive insistence on "obstruction". Not to mention taking WH spin as gospel.https://twitter.com/eorden/status/1037100913062686720 …
-
-
Must have really pained them to go there. 1 "conspired" versus 3 "obstruct" in the first 3 ¶s.pic.twitter.com/wtjQcwWE3Q
-
And let's just be clear that what the M&Ms won't say, but is surely obvious to anyone with half a brain is that "written answers" from Trump aren't actually FROM Trump. Instead they are prettified verbiage whose paternity comes only from those with JD degrees in obfuscation.pic.twitter.com/VTZ3Ztfuwq
-
Basically a trap, depending on what documents/testimony are out there contradicting whatever his lawyers prepare
-
I'm guessing that whatever "written answers" Trump's lawyers prepare, while they may not know the universe of what else is out there, will still be far more legally accurate than anything Trump would actually say or write himself.
-
You mean ... not straight-up perjury? LMAO
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Any thoughts on why Muellelr would agree to written answers on the conspiracy? My first thought is that Mueller has more than enough evidence to prove it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.