Turn you're thinking right side for a second. If Steele or Fus GPS can now verify those claimes in the Dossier, then he should just go show that verification to Mueller. They can't verify it and can't even stand in court behind it. That's because it's unverifiable.
-
-
Replying to @sonic_alexa @emptywheel and
Steele might not have used that exact word, "unverifiable", but that's basically what he admitted. Right?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No. Not right. Totally different words, and meaning, as I already noted twice. So you're conceding that one is wrong. How about who paid for the Gubarev report? Utterly central to everything else you said. Who paid for it?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
I concede that I don't if Steel ever used the word "unverifiable." But I think he said in different words, that we wouldn't be able to verify certain claims. Now, is that really what you hang your argument on, is if Steele used that exact word?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
A word that meant the same thing wouldn't be a bad start. But you don't have one. And, as others have pointed out to you, Steele actually believes most of it IS verified. Back to the Gubarev report. Who paid for it?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Steele does not believe that most of it IS verified. Here's what the National Review article states that Steele agreed the dossier was based on bits of “raw intelligence” that were “unverified” and that he passed along because they “warranted further investigation.”
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sonic_alexa @emptywheel and
Stop quoting the National Review article that provides no sourcing or fullmcontext for their claims about what Steele has said. It makes you look foolish.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Tweettstr @emptywheel and
Nonsense. The FBI officially stopped using Steele as a source because he he lied about leaking information to the press. That's what the FBI thought of Steele's reliability. But why would Steele leak to the press if he thought those claims "warranted further investigation?"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sonic_alexa @Tweettstr and
And why would Bruce Ohr continue to feed information from Steel's dossier after the FBI officially stopped using him as a source? Why wouldnt't Bruce Ohr not realize his own conflict of interest with his wife working and being paid by Fusion GPS to get info from steele?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sonic_alexa @Tweettstr and
Why would the FBI include false information in the dossier and omit material facts in their FISA application? If they weren't intentionally misleading the court, then what were they doing?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Aside from being word salad (why are you Trumpsters so bad w/the English language???), that tweet is ALSO inaccurate, per the congressional record you claim familiarity with. Give up. You're out of your league. Admit you'll never own a lib bc you don't read well enough.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.