So that's three articles where Steele agreed a very significant claim in the dossier was unverifiable. Of course I'm not lying. You liberals are very confused about what lying means. Do you think I'm intentionally misleading you?
-
-
Replying to @sonic_alexa @VocalLisa and
I did not say it was all primary documents. I said most of it was in congressional testimony. I cited the defamation case where Steele couldn't back up key specific claims made in the dossier. I've cited three articles and the primary source where he admitted as much.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Big boy. You've moved the ball twice, now. Your job--what you promised--was a primary document where Steele claimed this was "unverifiable." NOT "unverified." "Unverifiable," which was your claim. I'm waiting. Also, who paid for the Gubarev report? Waiting on that too.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
So if Steele admits that his sources would deny what he reported them to have said, would that be the same as him Steele saying we can't verify his claim?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sonic_alexa @emptywheel and
Turn you're thinking right side for a second. If Steele or Fus GPS can now verify those claimes in the Dossier, then he should just go show that verification to Mueller. They can't verify it and can't even stand in court behind it. That's because it's unverifiable.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sonic_alexa @emptywheel and
Steele might not have used that exact word, "unverifiable", but that's basically what he admitted. Right?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No. Not right. Totally different words, and meaning, as I already noted twice. So you're conceding that one is wrong. How about who paid for the Gubarev report? Utterly central to everything else you said. Who paid for it?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
I concede that I don't if Steel ever used the word "unverifiable." But I think he said in different words, that we wouldn't be able to verify certain claims. Now, is that really what you hang your argument on, is if Steele used that exact word?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
A word that meant the same thing wouldn't be a bad start. But you don't have one. And, as others have pointed out to you, Steele actually believes most of it IS verified. Back to the Gubarev report. Who paid for it?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
I don't know about the "Gubarev report." I was talking about Gubarev's defamation law suit against Steele. Again: If Steele admitted that his sources would deny what he claims them to have said, would that mean Steele's claims were unverifiable?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But it's right there in the primary document!! You are reading the primary document, aren't you? You see, some of your other claims are false and the proof is who paid for the report that ENTIRE primary document is about. Do you know what he means by "source"?
-
-
You're just hung up on this exact word, "unverifiable." I don't know if Steele ever used that exact word. But you're pinning your whole argument on things like: what percent of the dossier is true. Are you including things like, "Russia is a country," in that percent calc?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
"I don't know if Steele ever used that exact word." I'll take that as a concession you cannot validate the first statement I asked you to. Libs--owning. Want to keep going? Your next step is to tell me who paid for the report discussed in that primary document.
0 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.