This is false: Ohr did not "work on" the dossier. He did, however, try to prevent Russian organized crime. Maybe that's what bugs Rudy?https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1036068045989371909 …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @NatashaBertrand
Bruce Ohr didn't work on the false Russian dossier? But his wife did? Ohr passed the false Russian dossier funded by the Hillary campaign through back channels into the FBI.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The author of the dossier, Steele, is on the record for stating his adamant stance against the Trump candidacy. He’s also on the record stating that he didn’t believe a lot of the information in the dossier was true or even possible to verify.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Bruce Ohr knew all that. He knew of his own personal conflict of interest. It wasn’t even his job at the FBI to be investigating Russia-Trump Collusion yet he funneled that garbage in which was used as the basis for a FISA warrant.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sonic_alexa @NatashaBertrand
Do you want to provide links for your claims, or do you want me to just make a long list of the errors you've just made?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @NatashaBertrand
Which statement would you like me to link for you?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sonic_alexa @NatashaBertrand
Start with this, please: "He’s also on the record stating that he didn’t believe a lot of the information in the dossier was true or even possible to verify."
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @NatashaBertrand
In Gubarev v. Orbis "Defendants' Response to Claimants' Request for Further Information Pursuant CPR Part 18 in British court. Steele was sued for defamation. He stated that his allegations against Trump were based on limited intelligence and that they were "unverifiable."
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
1) ALL intelligence is "limited". But Steele considered THIS report to be up to 90% accurate. 2)Steele never said it was all unverifiable. Stop lying.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/01/christopher-steele-dossier-obama-administration-hillary-clinton-campaign-congress-fisa-court/ … Another article that says Steele admitted his claims were not verified. I never said he claimed it was ALL unverifiable. And anything might be up to 90% accurate.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Quick quiz, two questions: 1) You said this was all in primary documents. When I noted the primary document didn't say what you said, you linked to three propaganda pieces BASED ON THAT document. Why?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @sonic_alexa and
2) Are the words "verified" and "unverifiable" the same words? Because YOUR JOB--the one you were sure you could prove to own the libs--is to find where he says they were "unverifiable." So--wrong again.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @sonic_alexa and
You have indeed found propaganda pieces (NOT the primary document you claimed) that quote Steele's document (which you don't understand) saying that the stuff was "unverified." The only that says it was "unverifiable" is a quotation of SOMEONE ELSE. You get that now?
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.