Please. You people are reaching way too far.
-
-
I understand your theory and focus: they were all in on conspiracy that sanction relief, etc. was the "quo" therefore Flynn had to lie. But, your article did walk through obstruction elements. I mentioned the hole in the overall timeline of your article re obstruction.
-
Again, the ONLY aspect of obstruction I was interested in in that piece was pre-emptive pardons. I was CRITIQUING the obsession with obstruction.
-
Another hole: No direct evidence George thought talk of emails was related to DNC hack, vs Hillary's private server. Where are 302s on Mifsud? Why were they not disclosed? SC's argument on Mifsud is laughable. George and Mifsud story did not match. Mifsud not detained.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.