My Congressman is a Republican. He thinks Mueller should finish his investigation and then we should consider results seriously.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @jayacoop
I'll concede to that. I do not agree with the public, rhetorical crusifiction of a duly reflected, sitting president. You already know what i think of the investigation itself, but i digress.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ConservativeV11 @jayacoop
It's "crucifixion." And there's no crucifixion. It just so happens that there is a slew of evidence he committed a crime in about 5 different investigations. You said criminals should face justice. Not him?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @jayacoop
Sure. Let's publicly look at the evidence and start impeachment hearings. Why haven't they done that already?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ConservativeV11 @jayacoop
Well 1) Bob Goodlatte (who'd have to oversee this) is refusing to review evidence of crime -- I say that with 100% certainty 2) people like you are in denial about well-sourced (from Trump!) evidence.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @jayacoop
There is plenty of evidence being reviewed by a special counsel that has been corrupt since day one. This all goes back to the original question. If they all find no wrongdoing, would you hate him any less? The answer is no
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ConservativeV11 @emptywheel
Okay, now you are just slandering a dedicated public servant for no reason. Bob Mueller has given his whole life to service to this country. On THIS point I give no ground. If you are going to hurl slurs at him, you need to put up or shut up. What "corruption?" Cite or retract.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jayacoop @emptywheel
We have already gone over this. The entire special counsel is a crock of political bias. It's origin, it's scope, and it's investigatory members. Bob Mueller just happens to be the leader of the Witch Hunt
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ConservativeV11 @jayacoop
Curious: Do you know what evidence I provided that got moved under Mueller (presumably once FBI corroborated it)? Bc that had no tie to Strzok and implicates Trump directly.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
So you have no idea. Ok. So you have no idea what evidence came in via uncorrupted channels. Ok.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.