Count the errors in this tweet... Oh, never mind. It's Mark Meadows. No one considers it legit anyway.https://twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1034622819060076549 …
-
-
His info wasn't credible
-
Actually, that's not what the record of his reporting to FBI said. Do you know how FBI does these things? Or just happy to make it up?
-
Well, take Peter Schweizer's allegations in Clinton Cash. All from public source records, I believe. Supposedly, the FBI did investigate those claims in their investigation of the Clinton Foundation. That's the kind of info I can see the FBI taking. But Steele's info was...
-
third hand hearsay. He never even talked to his supposed sources. He had "collectors" in between. So Steele's history and credibility with the FBI was really irrelevant. The FBI needed to verify the info. To my knowledge they haven't. And then when Comey briefed Trump...
-
he acted like it was tabloid gossip. When Buzzfeed published it, James Clapper issued the following public statement.pic.twitter.com/omn7JjWR5i
-
Actually, it was Trump who acted like it was tabloid gossip, & did so in a way that was reminiscent of his old routine of 'seducing' friends' wives by having them secretly listening on speakerphone; as if to get Comey to say something sympathetic in the 'locker room talk' vein.
-
What? Let me ask you this : Why did Comey brief him on only the pee tape and not the parts about Manafort and Cohen? Why didn't he let him know it had been used to get A FISA?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.