-
-
I was responding to the quote in your tweet about scope, not every point Andy has ever made. I did not say GRU etc was part of scope, I simply said it was NOT as you stated "Mueller took over a CI investigation OF TRUMP's CAMPAIGN”. His scope also included CI invest of Russia.
-
No. It didn't. AGAIN, my knowledge is based, in part, on actual events. I'm talking about reality, and you're talking about a misunderstanding of basic grammar.
-
So If I go by what you are saying, would it be fair to assume Comey miss-led congress by stating there was CI investigation into Russian meddling when actually it was only the Trump campaign?
-
Nope. Did Comey say a single thing about how that investigation was structured?
-
He said “Investigating the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between..Trump Campaign”. Include definition is "contain as part of a whole”. If no other parts thats misleading.
-
So, no. He didn't make any comments about the structure of the investigation and you're back to misreading grammar? Again, I've got real dates of real events of real investigations that Andy and you claim were always under Mueller and you've got ... a problem with grammar.
-
so you agree his grammar was misleading?
-
His grammar described, as you said, about a whole (RU investigation) and a subset (Trump's people). Zero parts of that say anything about structure of investigation, about how that part related to the whole.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.