Sure you have. Reuters in February and WSJ in November both reported differently. The GRU indictment press release backs their reporting. Those bullet points have been litigated extensively. Pretty much all the evidence is against you.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @AndrewCMcCarthy
Care to provide me a link for Reuters / WSJ article that states Mueller was not appointed to investigate Russian interference in the election?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Have you read the heading of the appointment letter by the way? “Appointment of Special Counsel to investigate Russian interference with the 2016 presidential election and related matters”. How much clearer can that be?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dansolomonza @AndrewCMcCarthy
I'm sorry. Have you not understood when I said 1) this has been litigated 2) publicly reported 3) reinforced in subsequent press releases 4) (and also backed by my personal reporting and experience).
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @AndrewCMcCarthy
You say litigated, do you mean in court? Looking at Ellis ruling on Mueller legitimacy, page 10 quotes EXACTLY what I quoted in my tweets. Pg.10 https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000164-3dc7-dbdc-a96d-3dff8c890001 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dansolomonza @AndrewCMcCarthy
You mean those three bullets, which proves my point. You are wrong, and so is Andy, but again, I understand why you badly want not to be wrong.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @dansolomonza
I don’t understand the argument. It was the Russia investigation, the Trump campaign piece was a part of it, and regs say there’s no right to challenge DOJ on it. To say Rosenstein shouldn’t is not to say he couldn’t. What’s done is done.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AndrewCMcCarthy @emptywheel
Marcy started by claiming it was not a “Russia investigation” but “Mueller took over a CI investigation OF TRUMP's CAMPAIGN.” I have been trying, in vain, to show it was indeed a CI investigation of Russia and in addition the Trump campaign.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dansolomonza @AndrewCMcCarthy
And I've been pointing to all the evidence that tells you you're wrong. But again, I have first hand knowledge of this. I can assure you parts of what are now under Mueller weren't a year ago this time.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @AndrewCMcCarthy
And as I previously stated, what Mueller is DOING is / can be different from what he was appointed to do. His appointment letter and the references to it in Ellis judgement are plain simple english. Will tap out here, thanks for the back and forth! :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes. For the fifth time, the bullet points and about 5 other kinds of evidence support my case.
-
-
I'll add that the Page warrant application is another thing that supports my case.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.