Before I start this thread, I repeat what I said when Mueller was appointed: he was a good choice bc he had credibility, trust at FBI, and was perceived as non-partisan.https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/25/us/politics/robert-mueller-russia-investigation.html …
-
-
Having just credited Rudy G's tripe, NYT here -- on issue of final report -- doesn't (smartly). Add in the fact that Rosenstein keeps saying overandoverandover indictments will do the talking.pic.twitter.com/voZAAMqfhs
Show this thread -
Anyway, I still think Mueller was the right choice for the job. My guess though -- and that's all this is -- is that this investigation is different for him.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The executive power serms to have been subverted by a criminal in the wh and his minions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, and his political acumen in staging the timing of indictments etc has been really top notch. The aristocrat's sense of duty - and hes nothing if not an American aristocrat - makes me think he won't let I would wait upon I will
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.