Still no answer on 1) when McGahn's third (or more) interview was 2) whether it pertained to the case in chief.https://twitter.com/twpolk/status/1031684669543198726 …
-
Show this thread
-
One reason these stories (4 have been written now) abt McGahn that don't reveal when the third interview was are useless is bc if Trump only knows what McGahn said bc of Dowd debrief, and if interview happened after Dowd left, then Trump doesn't know.
2 replies 28 retweets 73 likesShow this thread -
And Burck's assurances that McGahn didn't incriminate Trump may not mean much if he revealed CAMPAIGN financial shenanigans that will lead people (Stone, Cohen, Jared, Parscale) to have to testify on Trump.pic.twitter.com/SJ1A1KkhP6
6 replies 37 retweets 89 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @TCleveland4Real
Unpossible. The NYT tells me obstruction is all that's being investigated.
3 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @TCleveland4Real
They believed this was only an obstruction investigation and still keep repeating it hoping it's true.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes
You go to impeachment defense with the lawyers that will work with you, not the competent ones.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.