I also mentioned Roger Stone's "dubious" ratfuckery (sue me, Rog).
-
-
Show this thread
-
I mentioned employing UK citizens who work for Cambridge Analytica w/o proper visas. But there's also abundant reason to suspect CA was doing most sketchy work for the PAC, but the PAC wasn't properly firewalled from the campaign.
Show this thread -
Remember that awesome complaint against Trump Foundation doing work for Trump campaign in NYS? Don McGahn has questions to answer about that.
Show this thread -
You know how Mueller is investigating the inauguration funding, all that big $$ coming in from RU oligarchs? Don McGahn.
Show this thread -
Oh. And then there's the big $$ from the NRA (Now a Russian Asset). Don McGahn might be expected to know about that, too.
Show this thread -
You see. Don McGahn definitely did stuff that exposed him to obstruction. But jeebus pete, the campaign finance issues behind questions of "collusion" are epic.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If he wasn't then it's evidence they were hiding it. There's no good answer to that question for Donny McCourtStack.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Yes. Which also raises questions about coordination. As Rog likes to boast, the case against him was dismissed. But not on financial grounds.
-
Hot damn. You are Woodward and Bernstein Marcy. How long until MSM picks up?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What about Lewandowski getting donations from the Foundation to toss out at campaign events. Seems like more than simply the Foundations problem but also the campaign’s problem.
-
Two tweets later--but yes, I had forgotten that until
@bmaz reminded me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One thing I haven’t seen you mention is that one of the most important things McGahn did for the campaign was prevent a contested convention at the RNC Rules Committee and convention, which meant he must have been working closely with Manafort and Gates...
-
I’ve mentioned it. That was first incarnation of Stone’s Stop the Steal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Late to this. But why do you think the times and post are both going out of their way to quote ppl saying Mcgahn told mueller he did not witness any wrongdoing by trump?
-
Because there's a big demand for stories about the Russian investigation, and McGahn (or his lawyer) is willing to tell any high level reporters who call that he didn't tell Mueller of any Trump crimes.
-
Meaning? He’s playing both sides? Trying to not piss odd trump?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.