I did 3 posts (!!) yesterday talking about what ISN'T in the BREAKING NYT piece on Don McGahn, but which is far more pertinent to current state of Mueller inquiry: McGahn's role in (& possible testimony on) protecting Roger Stone's legally suspect ratfuckery, going back 7 years.https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1031004193019047937 …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
You've pointed out that Maggie & Mike have been focusing on obstruction rather than collusion... do you have a WHY theory on that? Intentional? Blindness? Both? Other?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @iheartcarnitas
Bubble vision. They've got great access to Trump and his lawyers, and so take their version of "reality" from that. Also, they're political reporters, not legal ones.
11:01 AM - 20 Aug 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
6 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.