Which I had monetized the certainty that Trump would one day turn on a term he himself has mainstreamed to disavow the conspiracies he and his spawn engaged in.https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1031508193107763200 …
-
-
(1) Didn't actually happen, and interpreting the campaign contribution law as prohibiting "gifts" of information appears to violate the 1st Amendment (2) Not sure what the quo is. Or even the quid. No evidence of any pro either. (3) Computer fraud happened prior to contacts.
-
The Russians didn't start releasing stolen emails a week after the meeting? Yes. Actually they did. Computer fraud happened immediately after Trump asked for it. Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with the public record?
-
For the record, I know more about the public record than virtually anyone. Ask me anything. (3)
-
No thanks. You've made it crystal clear you're not familiar with the record. I'll mute you now.
-
Heh, I took the trouble, being a nosey cow, to take a look at this poster's following list. omfg, lol.
-
FWIW, my follower to tweet ratio is higher than yours. In any case, I don't need, or even want, followers. I'm creating an archive for my own purposes.
-
Wasn't talking about your followers, keep up, was talkling about the cretins you follow.
-
I follow
@emptywheel. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.