In light of today's latest Haberman/Schmidt story, which merits large grains of salt, a look back at Jan. 208: What’s Up With McGahn Revisionism?http://www.lawfareblog.com/whats-mcgahn-revisionism …
-
-
Mind you, virtually none of that is on NYT (they admit they don't know if he's been asked about conspiracy case in chief). Because NYT prefers to talk about how Stone is like a pirate.
-
What significance in McGahn’s third interview? Why do you suggest it’s about Stone? What’s the McGahn/Stone connection beyond McGahn FEC rulings in 2012 campaign? Did you unearth more that I missed?
-
Yes. You did. McGahn was also involved in covering both incarnations of Stone's 2016 rat-fuckery. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/08/18/why-would-don-mcgahn-and-his-lawyer-cooperate-in-a-piece-claiming-he-cooperated-with-mueller-on-obstruction/ … If one consults what Mueller has been doing for 6 months rather than reading 20th NYT story on obstruction, focus on Stone is clear https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/08/16/andrew-millers-five-month-stall-leads-to-a-six-month-investigation-of-roger-stone/ …
-
I agree that Mueller is heavily focused on Stone and I’m willing to believe that McGahn was involved with Stone in 2016 but I don’t see evidence for the latter in the stories you linked in this graf. Maybe I’ve missed stuff.pic.twitter.com/cbun7E5cPu
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.