I'm baffled by that story. Did they get played?
-
-
-
I don't know. But somehow they published >2000 words without answering the most basic question: whether McGahn has been asked about conspiracy.
-
Even a marginally competent editor should have wanted that question answered -- or at least addressed.
-
Maybe. 90% of people following this story believe Maggie and Mike in their grossly erroneous claim that Trump is only at risk for obstruction.
-
I await your blog post, so I can link to it.
New conversation -
-
-
How conscious do you think they are of that omission?
-
Dunno. I'd be humiliated if I kept pushing the obstruction line like they do. But maybe they believe it?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Access journalism at its finest.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump people leaked it so I dint trust it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maggie thinks Melania is “mysterious” lol. She’s the J.k.Rowling of access journalism in the US.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I found the whole piece odd and half-complete as well. Don McGahn covered his own butt when the first Trump team gave legally him the opportunity? Shocking!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The whole story is designed to push this sentence: “Mr. McGahn cautioned to investigators that he never saw Mr. Trump go beyond his legal authorities, though the limits of executive power are murky.” Maggie is a White House shill.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess Don didn't want to include that bit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Probably just McGahn sourcing his own puff piece again. Like the time Maggie and Mike put out that story about how McGahn stopped Trump from firing Mueller.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or even try
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gotta leave something for their next "breaking".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well his attorney said he answered All special counsel’s questions. If they didn’t ask it’s kind of negligent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.