This piece is (searching for the word) funny. It confuses WHCO with personal lawyer. It doesn't mention that one thing McGahn produced (Flynn report) was badly misleading. It uses the word "cooperate" in a misleading way. It continues to treat obstruction as only investigation.https://twitter.com/JasonLeopold/status/1030879950872576001 …
-
-
Are we talking about charges levied against the "president" or his cronies? You don't seem to want to stay on track. My comments were in regards to charging a sitting POTUS with high crimes or misdemeanors. Not criminals left in his wake. Mueller will allow congress this honor.
-
Not if he’s smart, he won’t. This Congress has no honor (with the exception of them allowing Mueller to continue to operate).
-
I'm sure he would prefer to do it himself, specially with the a clearly criminal implicit Congress. But it is unclear whether he has legal standing to indict trump. Congress does, and likely will. Congress had Nixon's back until the bitter end, then they turned on him.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.