This piece is (searching for the word) funny. It confuses WHCO with personal lawyer. It doesn't mention that one thing McGahn produced (Flynn report) was badly misleading. It uses the word "cooperate" in a misleading way. It continues to treat obstruction as only investigation.https://twitter.com/JasonLeopold/status/1030879950872576001 …
-
-
maggie strikes again!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there any chance Dowd/Cobb were actually trying to encourage Democracy? Nah... asked and answered.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, who do you think planted this story? McGahn?
-
Guiliani. Something from McGahn testimony must be about to come out and this is their way of trying to get ahead of it
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well I mean... Maggie wrote it. So kinda have to accept that. I feel like she trades too much for access. Wish she would realize they need her more than she needs them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I was 'wut?' until I saw your emoticons.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
McGahn = John Dean


Am I understanding correctly?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not the client's job to offer legal opinions to his attorney, an opinion that they accept, which is what we're asked to believe when they say "they took him at his word."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IOW they didn't realize their client was lying to them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.