What about Sekulow's list of questions, though, certainly those came from Mueller's team somehow?
-
-
-
In early March. NYT has been retelling that story on a near weekly basis ever since.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don’t get the implication, what is the entirely different step? somebody ELI5 please
-
I think it possible we'll see an indictment of very senior people in the nearish future, with Trump named as Male 1 or similar.
-
Ah okay thanks. You think before the election? Or is it hard to say
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Whatdya mean? Mueller will indict Trump?
-
He's said in the past he doesn't believe president can be indicted. Likely indict those around him and list him as conspirator.
-
I need someone with intimate knowledge of the law to explain to me why you couldn't indict a sitting president if that president had committed a crime. The president is not a king. The president is not above the law. Does impeachment have to happen first?
#LawSplain please. -
Thank you for the link... I skimmed it but I have to go out. I'll read it closer in the morning.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He. Doesn’t. Need. The. Interview. Or. He. Would. Have. Subpoenaed. Him. Already.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How many of those indicted will ever step foot in this country? Of the remaining few, how many have anything to do with collusion? Can we stop pretending that Mueller is on some massive case?
-
What makes you think it's a pretence?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly. We need his interview just as much as we need an “n-word tape” to know he’s a racist.
#wedon’tThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Completely agree - I hate we're caught up in this "interview" drama. Despite all the howling to the opposite, a lot of media sources hang on to Giuliani's every word. We're still giving Trump's team the ability to control the narrative.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's in the Bargaining Stage. Art of the deal, indeed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AND he may not ever need a single statement from Trump to come to his conclusions. Then Trump will cry "they never gave me a chance to tell my side of the story" - fortunately, that BS can't be taken up to the Supremes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lots of loose ends still: - DOJ IG report about 2016 SDNY; - Roger, Caputo, Credico, Peter W Smith, Greenberg, etc; - Butina, NRA, JD Gordon; - Daily obstruction, witness tampering; There's no 'wrap up' anytime soon.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.