Well that just got more interesting then confirmation that Trump uses the N-word. Even more interesting than Michael Cohen's promises.https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/1029431749388976128 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Except, Clinton’s emails never surfaced and were presumably never successfully hacked. Unless we consider the Podesta or other Dem hacked materials to be Clinton’s in a loose sense, her claim doesn’t make sense.
Every body and their mother has been making that assumption for two years, It's Tur, not Omarosa that refers to them as such here, but by all means use that as a means to discredit Omarosa.
I’m not trying to discredit her. I also didn’t see it, so if she didn’t characterize the emails that way, please disregard my comment.
No one even has the basic facts straight. It's Idiocracy
By no one, you mean, you? I agree then.
They can't even keep straight the 2 WL releases and Hillary's server
I think she's rather unreliable, but I watched The Apprentice when she was on it and he clearly liked the way she lied and stabbed people in the back. They share a love of revenge.
Until now, perhaps.
Thoughts on possible manafort mistrial?
You mean the trial that's headed to closing arguments tomorrow?
That’s the one
That was one vicious nasty Katy Tur interview of Omarosa. Ari Melber and Nicolle Wallace would certainly have created a smooth narrative and poked around effectively. Katy's vicious air of having a liar in her grasp was stunning to watch.pic.twitter.com/rgcbrrnteG
Vicious? Nasty? I saw the interview twice and those words don't apply to Ms. @KatyTurNBC .
Over the top yes. But I'm with those who think Katy doesn't treat other book peddlers this way. Especially all the old white men on the shows.
Do you treat old white men like you treat Katy Tur?
Best comment today! 
I'm in the midst of reading her book (oops, wish I hadn't spent the $14.99). She may not be uniquely unreliable, but when she explains things she supposedly "knows", it tends to be on the basis of unsubstantiated guessing.
Is this about the DNC hack or about the Clinton emails found by the NY feds on Wieners computer? because either would be rather interesting obviously but point to a very different conspiracy/players.
Except they were discussing "Hillary's emails" huh?
Cuomo thinks they were talking about the DNC emailshttps://twitter.com/CuomoPrimeTime/status/1029537735223128064?s=19 …
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.