Was this publicly revealed information included in FISA app to inform the judge where the info came from & how it was coordinated among media, lobbyists, HRC/lawyers? Or was it deliberately hidden to obscure bias?
-
-
Replying to @ThAlMeArCrEq @MZHemingway
You misunderstand entirely. What I was saying is that FISA was under scrutiny by people before this started. Nunes largely thwarted that scrutiny at a time when it could have been changed.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
But as to whether Steele's conflicts as a consultant were disclosed, yes, they were. And he had a better TRACK RECORD than a lot of the consultants that are used on FISA apps. That's the problem w/taking FISA info from people who don't know it. They don't know norm.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @MZHemingway
Perhaps they were minimally disclosed, but that doesn’t paint a complete picture re bias to a judge. Minimal info is not how ex parts procedures shld be. But you don’t have the complete unredacted app & renewals. I and many others want to see them to make our own assessment.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThAlMeArCrEq @MZHemingway
MINIMALLY DISCLOSED? There were pages and pages of footnotes. Maybe you should look at the filing before you claim that pages and pages of disclosure amount to minimal disclosure. Molly won't tell you this stuff, you know.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @MZHemingway
Release the unredacted application and renewals. Then people won’t need Molly or you to come to their own conclusions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThAlMeArCrEq @MZHemingway
But they (meaning you) already don't need to do that. The pages and pages of caveats are public, something Molly won't tell you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ThAlMeArCrEq @MZHemingway
You keep saying that. All while proving overandoverandoverandover that 1) You won't read what is released in any case 2) Molly won't tell the truth about what is released in any case
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @MZHemingway
Yes because it’s what I and many others want and demand. Do you understand what unredacted means? Keep mentioning Molly. That’ll get you exactly nowhere. Releasing unredacted documents will.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I understand that what you are DEMANDING to see is unredacted, so your DEMANDS to see unredacted documents make you look like a chump who fell for propaganda.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @MZHemingway
Ok. Keep calling people names. See where that gets you. Good evening. And didn’t you know? Obama legalized govt funded propaganda.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
^good day, but have a good evening too.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.