Right, because @realDonaldTrump has been so successful in getting his own DOJ to do his bidding.
-
-
-
You missed the policies pulling $$ from white collar enforcement and using it to criminalize brown people? The "religious freedom" stuff designed to do the opposite? The attempt to turn MS-13 into the biggest threat in the country? Or ... you don't know what you're talking abt.
-
Yep, I only focused on the investigation designed to remove the President from office and his constant calls to expose corruption under previous administration.
-
Unprecedented efforts have also been focused on what Trump claims is corruption, and yet no evidence of corruption has been shown. Perhaps, maybe, Trump made that up?
-
The other way - zero evidence of collusion, lot's of evidence of corruption under Obama's DOJ in Clinton and Trump investigations. Yet he can't get his own DOJ to shut down Mueller or provide unreducted Docs to Congress.
-
Oh, he has (or had, at one time), a way to shut down Mueller. He knows if he does it will accelerate impeachment. But thanks for telling me there's no evidence of "collusion" so I can dismiss you as a flat-earther.
-
OK, so we agree - he has as much influence to shut down Mueller as he does to have any impact on the McCabe investigation. Which was my original point. As to me being a flat-earther, I think I got that designation with my deplorable certificate, no?
-
Say. Did you notice McCabe got fired. You keep pointing to facts that prove my case, and prove you're just repeating propaganda.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I know you’ve brought this up a lot but I continue to be extremely frustrated by the complete disinterest the press has in the NY FBI office’s disdain for Hillary and how they changed the course of history.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is so weird to equate Judicial Watch with 'appropriate' = I don't know about the Justice Department 'government authorities. How do you reckon with this as the top of the executive of any country-let alone an open Democracy? It's much worse than most admit.
-
Does he even realize that Judicial Watch is not a governmental agency?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And he will be right to do so. Though it is a motion that never works.
-
Could he plead Not Guilty By Reason Of Sean Hannity?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Decent chance*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They won't dare touch McCabe. It's just red meat for the base. He knows more than we think.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Safe bet that Michael R. Bromwich has screen shots.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
McCabe did not do anything wrong, when the whole story comes out he's was conducting CI ops under the William Evanina's direction and i say that's a near certainty since the CI context is actually missing from the OGE report
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since when is Judicial Watch, a right-wing 501c3 shill for Trump, akin to a governmental authority?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
McCabe on his own did not just decide to start helping Trump and hurting Clinton, but if he did this right here would be grounds to invalidate the election. Yet, McCabe is defending himself and there is only one defense; a get out jail free card from the NCIX
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.