of course not. i'm just pointing out another quote that to me points to a different interpretation!
-
-
Replying to @aaronjmate
Aaron. Tell me what the interpretation you think I've made is. Because you seem to misunderstand it.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I interpret from your piece that the Kremlin got Goldstone to leave a trail of crumbs which it could then use as kompromat/receipts on Trump's willingness to collude. Whereas I just think Goldstone was being a good publicist for his client, and exaggerated for effect.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @aaronjmate
1) I've made no allegations abt a tie to the Kremlin here. Stop making stuff up. 2) If you want to prove what Agalarov wanted Goldstone to do, why would you use Goldstone's exaggerated version? Try again Aaron. I've got just a touch of patience left.
2 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @aaronjmate
Btw, for the purposes of the conspiracy case, it matters what Junior agreed to, not what Agalrov's basic facts were. He agreed to what Goldstone (w/some contrary evidence) claims was just exaggeration.
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @aaronjmate
NB,
@aaronjmate, there were no 'stolen emails' references in the Goldstone messages to Junior, as I already noted to Marcy earlier. People are trying to raise this email issue after the fact w/ a disputed Papadopoulos Jan 27, 2017 claim w/ no hard evidence to back it up.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @88softaIlherita @aaronjmate
Which is earliest: July 2016, January 2017, or October 2017?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @aaronjmate
I'd prefer a real-time receipt for the APRIL 2016 "thousands of emails" claim, esp when one of the principals is disputing that claim. But, sure, I'm willing to listen to any HARD evidence you claim to have.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @88softaIlherita @aaronjmate
We'll get that eventually. Just hold your horses for the indictment. Until then, which of those three is the earliest? It's not a hard question.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @aaronjmate
You're still begging the question, Marcy. Are we talking hard evidence or more of your disputed sources?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Who is disputing my sources? Two of them predicted stuff that made the GRU indictment. This is simple. Which of three dates is the earliest? Can you manage that simple question?
-
-
For the third time. Which is earliest: July 2016, January 2017, or October 2017? Bonus points: Which is second earliest?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @aaronjmate
Ok, I'll be a good sport--July 2016. Now let's see what you have in terms of hard evidence. Your turn, Marcy.
0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.