Goldstone's Bare Facts: Attorney, Damaging Information, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Useful to the Trumps https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/08/06/goldstones-bare-facts-attorney-damaging-information-democrats-hillary-clinton-useful-to-the-trumps/ … Goldstone says he just did what he was told. That was sufficient in collecting another receipt showing Don Jr's willingness to conspire to help Dad.
-
-
I'd prefer a real-time receipt for the APRIL 2016 "thousands of emails" claim, esp when one of the principals is disputing that claim. But, sure, I'm willing to listen to any HARD evidence you claim to have.
-
We'll get that eventually. Just hold your horses for the indictment. Until then, which of those three is the earliest? It's not a hard question.
-
You're still begging the question, Marcy. Are we talking hard evidence or more of your disputed sources?
-
Who is disputing my sources? Two of them predicted stuff that made the GRU indictment. This is simple. Which of three dates is the earliest? Can you manage that simple question?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
For the third time. Which is earliest: July 2016, January 2017, or October 2017? Bonus points: Which is second earliest?
-
Ok, I'll be a good sport--July 2016. Now let's see what you have in terms of hard evidence. Your turn, Marcy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.