Goldstone's Bare Facts: Attorney, Damaging Information, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Useful to the Trumps https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/08/06/goldstones-bare-facts-attorney-damaging-information-democrats-hillary-clinton-useful-to-the-trumps/ … Goldstone says he just did what he was told. That was sufficient in collecting another receipt showing Don Jr's willingness to conspire to help Dad.
-
-
of course not. i'm just pointing out another quote that to me points to a different interpretation!
-
Aaron. Tell me what the interpretation you think I've made is. Because you seem to misunderstand it.
-
I interpret from your piece that the Kremlin got Goldstone to leave a trail of crumbs which it could then use as kompromat/receipts on Trump's willingness to collude. Whereas I just think Goldstone was being a good publicist for his client, and exaggerated for effect.
-
1) I've made no allegations abt a tie to the Kremlin here. Stop making stuff up. 2) If you want to prove what Agalarov wanted Goldstone to do, why would you use Goldstone's exaggerated version? Try again Aaron. I've got just a touch of patience left.
-
Btw, for the purposes of the conspiracy case, it matters what Junior agreed to, not what Agalrov's basic facts were. He agreed to what Goldstone (w/some contrary evidence) claims was just exaggeration.
-
NB,
@aaronjmate, there were no 'stolen emails' references in the Goldstone messages to Junior, as I already noted to Marcy earlier. People are trying to raise this email issue after the fact w/ a disputed Papadopoulos Jan 27, 2017 claim w/ no hard evidence to back it up. -
Which is earliest: July 2016, January 2017, or October 2017?
-
I'd prefer a real-time receipt for the APRIL 2016 "thousands of emails" claim, esp when one of the principals is disputing that claim. But, sure, I'm willing to listen to any HARD evidence you claim to have.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
How can information from a foreigner be a "thing of value" without criminalizing oppo research? Example: if you suspect your opponent did some shady shit while living in London, how do you investigate if literally anything you hear from a UK citizen would be a "thing of value?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.