Yes. You can investigate that by yourself. And as pointed out by Adam, it seems very likely that Guccifer 2.0 was indeed involved.https://twitter.com/with_integrity/status/1025056845910683648 …
Well, when he does that, get back to me. Point is, he doesn't even understand that his site undermines all his pet theories bc he doesn't know what the object of study is.
-
-
> bc he doesn't know what the object of study is. Off course he knows what object of HIS study is. He analyzed it and published it on his website. [Or by your theory, he just published it and someone else analyzed it.] Which doesnt change a thing about findings of analysis.pic.twitter.com/M4bYZwTNob
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.