Hi. Perhaps you don't understand what "Adam's" role in this is. It's to magnify certain views, w/o personally authoring anything but the serially more ridiculous for other culprits besides teh Russians. IDing the person--and the lies--behind that effort is not ad hom.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @Undetermined_US
114218876441 Retweeted
I Know Adam. I am mentioned in article. Adam
@with_integrity is nothing but critical thinking individual with who analyzed some metadata and published his analysis so anyone can see it and double check his findings. https://twitter.com/114218876441/status/1024454034562924544 …114218876441 added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Oh. Which metadata did he analyze?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Seeing as how I've responded to it numerous times, I'm surprised you have to ask. All he does there is the webmastering and the presentation of one after another evidence free theory to explain how someone other than the most obvious culprit hacked the DNC.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
No. You got the last part wrong. > how someone other than the most obvious culprit hacked the DNC. All Adam investgates is Guccifer2.0. Nothing about GRU and FSB hack of DNC servers. Nothing about Seth Rich. Nothing about source of Wikileaks.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
If all he investigates is G2, then why does he focus on the NGP VAN file, which was not directly released by G2? And why does he focus on the DNC releases when stuff linked at his own site makes it clear that G2 stated by leaking Podesta files, not DNC ones?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Iirc NGP VAN file was investigated by Forensicator. (I might be wrong, need to check) G2 started by leaking Trump Oposition Research file on his blog, I think that file was "supposed to be stolen" directly from DNC server.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes, as I noted, "Adam" just posts other people's analysis, like that of "Forensicator." Yet why post it if G2 didn't actually post that file? It would only be relevant to the question of who G2 is if you prove that it came from him, which no one has ever attempted to do.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
NGP VAN is interesting as part of bigger picture. But main point is only about G2 And during analysis of his behavior we didnt check only his files. Adam (and others) analyzed times when he was active (it looks like US working hours), his twitter DMs, language analysis...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
No. If the main point is only about G2, then you cannot present the Forensicator stuff w/o answering the MOST BASIC question: provenance. Sadly, "Adam" showed no interest in doing so.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.