With all due respect, looks like stuff I've written before and in no way lays out what Trump knew when. That letter was publicly disclosed.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
But the letter was used with very selective quotation by Dowd and Sekulow to blow smoke; this destroys that. Or are you saying you’ve seen the full McGahn memo and have reported it out?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mattseaton
I've reported enough of the McGahn memo to find this uninteresting. Moreover, as I said, anyone pushing obstruction at this point is doing Rudy G's work.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
By that logic, Mueller probably is! Well, have a good day.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattseaton
No. That's not what Mueller is focusing on Trump for. Which is my point. This is a big scoop misrepresenting what Mueller is investigating. Which is an effort Rudy has been pushing with great success, which is why those letters came out.
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @mattseaton
Marcy, sometimes honorable people can disagree on issues in the political discourse. I believe Mueller's obstruction probe is legitimate & important. You don't. I have no reason to question your integrity or character for having a different opinion, and hope you believe the same.
4 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @murraywaas @mattseaton
Murray. It's not that I don't believe an obstruction inquiry is legitimate. It's that I know better, knowing FAR MORE about this case than you, than to believe it's the end all and be all. Moreover, I have very good reason to believe the focus on it right now is a WH strategy.
1 reply 7 retweets 25 likes -
Now if you want to dismiss my far greater knowledge about this case as an attack on your integrity, I guess that's your prerogative. Again, all I said is that I didn't find that article all that interesting. I don't. Sorry.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Yikes Marcy sounds very Trumpian with this tweet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You're telling me that accusing me of attacking somoene's integrity bc I, instead, said, that's not an interesting article is cool? That's crazypants, sorry.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Or is it bc a woman pointed out, correctly, that she has more knowledge on a subject than a man who is demanding she hail his work? Is that it?
-
-
Yes it’s a man vs woman issue - maybe you’d a call it a witch hunt?

0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.