This WaPo article IS a good introduction in how Manafort's consulting ties together with his tax evasion. I like the way it pitches Manafort as the consummate lobbyist bc it universalizes sleazy influence-peddling. Good!
-
Show this thread
-
But in my opinion this inaccurate (it would be true of the DC case, but this isn't the DC case).pic.twitter.com/ibp9uT4qvS
4 replies 11 retweets 37 likesShow this thread -
Consider: the year 2016 appears 205 times in the Govt exhibit list: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.383106/gov.uscourts.vaed.383106.142.0_6.pdf …
1 reply 19 retweets 49 likesShow this thread -
While the tax returns that will be used as exhibits go back to 2011, 2016's taxes will be discussed at length (there are emails about that tax return prep).pic.twitter.com/bcd6yWOXjG
2 replies 18 retweets 53 likesShow this thread -
Perhaps most troubling, here's what appears in paragraphs 31 and 32 in a story that claims this trial is about work done years before Trump campaign.pic.twitter.com/rZxqP2vG71
5 replies 35 retweets 73 likesShow this thread -
This is a story about how Manafort became so illiquid he had to break the law to maintain his lifestyle, but nevertheless worked for Trump for "free." The mortgage (¶31 of 33) is one explanation of how and why Manafort was willing to do it: to sustain more graft.
3 replies 39 retweets 158 likesShow this thread -
The other explanation -- one we may see in an eventual Manafort trial that will detail how he asked Russians for help winning the election -- is that he wasn't working for "free," he was expecting compensation from Russia.
7 replies 45 retweets 166 likesShow this thread -
emptywheel Retweeted emptywheel
Update: I'm going to correct myself. In a filing submitted today, Mueller's team argues essentially what WaPo did that I complained about in this tweet. I'd rephrase it (it's not abt kind of work--that's DC--it's abt $$ made) https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.383106/gov.uscourts.vaed.383106.182.0_1.pdf …https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1023949015120007168 …
emptywheel added,
1 reply 13 retweets 40 likesShow this thread -
But it's clear Mueller intends (assuming they win this fight over evidence) to describe at some length how much work Manafort did for Ukrainian and Russian oligarchs, to establish that they paid him $60M.
3 replies 15 retweets 78 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @emptywheel
It is hard to see any evaluation of probative versus prejudicial that would support Ellis suppressing this evidence. But it is Eliis, so who knows?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
That's why they play the game!!! So people who don't know Ellis at all can misread him!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.