That's not saying that it's illegal or banned by policy, but it's not a particularly natural way for a DOJ-trained prosecutor to charge a conspiracy case.
-
-
Yeah. Absent a report, I expect that the most likely role for POTUS is being named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the broader indictment of a bunch of inner-circle people. One thing I'm interested in is why Mueller is being so lackadaisical about pushing the POTUS interview.
-
For reasons I won't get into, I don't rule out Mueller charging the conspiracy with POTUS as Male 1 BEFORE an interview, not least to forestall pardons.
-
I agree. It may not just forestall pardons, it may render them legally impossible -- depending on whether a pardon can be obstruction in furtherance of a conspiracy.
-
Right. So I think he's waiting to see if Manafort really wants to go to trial, tidying up Stone, and otherwise is pretty close.
-
Strongly agreed. There are things from the GRU indictment which indicate that some of the information from the indictment could not have been obtained any later than March of 2017. DOJ could have pushed that indictment out much earlier than this summer.
-
Such as?
-
Wow, yolo, don't think I've read you before! Pls tweet often in emp's timeline, which I check 1x/day but don't understand abt 30%. You're super clear. emp's regulars are too technical but not their fault bc a) it's Twitter & b) they're extracting from 15,000 underlying points.
-
I'm certainly clear, but remember that I don't actually know shit about shit and don't have sources.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.