As I noted before today's news firehose started in earnest, SSCI didn't consider RU hacks of election vendors (as opposed to states). Yet we know RU did hack some vendors. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/05/09/the-gaping-holes-in-the-ssci-voting-security-report/ …
-
-
Conspiracy charges. DOJ guidelines, IIRC, recommend charging all members of a conspiracy simultaneously, because later-charged conspirators gain an an advantage over earlier-charged conspirators -- something you don't want if you're ladder-climbing.
-
What is the advantage in this case? I could explain what structure I expect they'll use but I need to understand what you're saying first.
-
No, exactly. Because of the two-headed management structure of the hypothetical conspiracy, and the fact that no RU-side conspirators are expected to testify, there are fewer disadvantages in this case.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.